Musik » guing against it and the other half busily designing it! The week a

Giles Clarke, the ECB president, is set to renew his relationship with the Pakistan Cricket Board, after being tasked alongside Dave Richardson, the ICC chief executive, to explore ways to boost the boards economy in the absence of any home international matches.The decision was taken at the quarterly ICC board meeting that concluded in Cape Town on Friday. The board also agreed to look into financial assistance for the PCB given that it has now been almost eight years since their cricketers were last able to play a match in front of their home fans.Clarke, who is a member of the powerful Financial and Commercial Affairs Committee, headed up the ICCs original Pakistan Task Force in 2009, although he was unable to visit the country in that capacity due to the ongoing security concerns.Despite their difficulties, Pakistans Test team rose to become the No.1 nation earlier this year following a hugely creditable 2-2 draw in their away series against England. It is understood that Clarke is scheduled to meet PCB officials in a months time to chalk out the details of the ICCs funding exercise.We reflect the unique contribution of Pakistan to world cricket. There is a huge amount of goodwill at the ICC board table for Pakistan, Clarke told ESPNcricinfo. Along with the [ICC] chief executive, I have been charged with looking at how we can assist Pakistan. Some of the economics of life has not been easy for Pakistan because they cant play home games.We are looking at the economics of Pakistan cricket, seeing where the ICC can help in recognising the importance of Pakistan to the international cricketing community, and to the cricketing world. They got the Test mace and played a superb series in England this summer. They were magnificent on and off the pitch during the England series.Describing himself as a very committed supporter of Pakistan cricket, Clarke said he had spent seven years trying to figure out ways to develop the game in the country.We have made a bit of progress today with some of the ideas that came out of the meeting. Dave Richardson and I are going to see what we can do to help Pakistan cricket economically and what we can do what possibilities are there for anyone to tour Pakistan.However, the prospect of international cricket making a permanent return to Pakistan remains doubtful. Earlier this year, memories of the terrorist attack on the Sri Lanka team bus in March 2009 were revived when another terrorist attack ripped through Lahore, killing at least 72 people and injuring 300 others in Gulshan-i-Iqbal, a popular hangout.As you know, we were a very long way down the road with a concept of having a heavyweight world team tour Pakistan and play against Pakistan, said Clarke. Then the atrocity in Lahore absolutely scuppered that.As a consequence of that attack, the PCB had to terminate a planned World XI versus Pakistanis match, an exercise that had been intended to provide a first step towards a return of full international cricket.Cricket does not belong in a war zone, said Clarke. [But] Cricket does belong in Pakistan. If we are going to bring world cricket back to Pakistan, then we will need the help of the vast number of massively enthusiastic Pakistani cricket followers - which in my view is most of the country. Because it is the bad guys who are stopping us. If you love cricket in Pakistan, you know we cant have atrocities. It stops people from coming. But if you give up, then the terrorist wins. I am not bloody giving up.According to Clarke, PCB executive chairman Najam Sethi made a very powerful plea which had struck a chord with the ICC board during the Cape Town meeting. Sethi had been representing his board in the absence of Shaharyar Khan, who could not attend due to health reasons.During his address, Sethi focused on the major issues that were denting Pakistan cricket financially. Aside from Zimbabwes limited-overs tour in May 2015, have played all of their matches since 2009 in the UAE. However, the extra costs incurred by those matches have directly hampered the development of the game back home in Pakistan.In a bid to shore up their domestic infrastructure, the PCB recently began work on 16 regional academies as a part of their developmental plan. Another option under consideration is that ICC should help carry the cost of Pakistans bilateral series in the UAE.There is, however, an acceptance from all parties that it will ultimately be down to the players themselves to determine whether they are prepared to tour Pakistan again. As Englands current tour of Bangladesh shows, administrators cannot force players to tour when they are not comfortable with the security. Wholesale Kevin Durant Shoes . Colin Wilson had two goals and an assist, and Mike Fisher scored a goal and helped set up two others in the Predators 6-4 victory over the Red Wings on Monday night. Cheap Kevin Durant Shoes . -- Playing time has been limited for Maxim Tissot this season, so the Montreal Impact defender made the most of his first scoring opportunity on Saturday. https://www.kevindurantshoescheap.com/ . -- Nathan Pancel scored twice as the Sudbury Wolves defeated the North Bay Battalion 4-2 on Saturday in Ontario Hockey League action. Clearance Kevin Durant Shoes . Perez, 35, posted a 1-2 record with a 3.69 earned-run average in 19 relief appearances last season. His season ended Aug. 9 due to a torn ligament in his left elbow. Perez joins infielder Andy LaRoche and catcher Mike Nickeas with minor-league agreements for 2014 that include invitations to attend spring training. Kevin Durant Shoes For Sale . -- Team after team passed on Andre Ellington in the draft. Williams technical director Pat Symonds says he is not aware of a loophole in next years regulations that is capable of giving a team an advantage similar to the one Brawn GP had in 2009.Brawn GP managed to win the title in its single year of competition, despite limited testing and a modest budget compared to its rivals. The team gained a significant advantage by interpreting the rules around the rear of the car differently to allow for a double-decked diffuser producing more rear downforce. Only Toyota and Williams did the same, but came up with less effective solutions.Although several other teams were aware of the loophole that allowed the double diffuser, they opted to take a literal interpretation of the regulations and started the season with a single-deck diffuser. When the FIA conceded that the double diffuser was allowed under the regulations, all teams came up with their own versions -- albeit retrofitted to their original designs.With wider tyres, wider cars and new dimensions for the diffuser, front wing and rear wing, 2017 presents a bigger overhaul of the regulations than the 2009 changes, but Symonds says he is not aware of a loophole with the same potential as the double diffuser.2009 was slightly different, he said. There was a huge discrepancy between the teams but largely because there was a somewhat twisted use of semantics to interpret a regulation that made a fantastic difference.Now that may happen again -- if it does, were in trouble because we havent seen it -- but if everything is equal, and were all interpreting the rules in a similar way, then okay, thats one thing. 2009 was different because there was this interpretation [around the double diffuser] and at Renault we asked the question could we do this and we were told no.dddddddddddd Later it transpired the FIA said we asked the question in the wrong way -- Ive never quite understood it -- but yeah, we missed it and it was hard to get back.It was quite interesting, those of us who didnt have the double diffuser, we had half our crew in Paris arguing against it and the other half busily designing it! The week after the court of appeal, we were in China with a double diffuser. We didnt start the development after the court of the appeal, we started that a long while before.Symonds said trying to find a different interpretation of the rules has become a key part of modern Formula One car design.Thats something that is part of our jobs and I think some teams are very aggressive at it and very good at it, more so, for example, that we are at Williams. We seem to be working flat-out just doing what we need to do, but I know that other teams do have people with that fundamental job -- to look at everyone elses cars and see what they can see thats wrong with them and then look at the rules over and over again to see how you can exploit them.But when I say exploit, I dont mean cheat or anything like that, I mean just making sure that, coming back to semantics [of the rules], they think I know thats what he [the rule maker] meant, but whats he said?. Thats what it comes down to, and quite often they are not the same thing. ' ' '